Justin’s Work

week 6:

A couple stand outs from Steinke’s essay:

“My face, while a body part, is much more than a hand or a foot -it stands for my whole body, my whole self”.

The face is a logo, a symbol that advocates for the Other. It leaves an impression that is warm and welcoming, but also the power to dispell. For Steinke, the face is much more than the sum of her parts, it is beyond them; It is both her identity, and also, gift of recognition. An exchange that has been challenged by the pandemic. At it’s extreme, this period has kept people and places at a distance, in walls and fabrics. In other words, Steinke’s gift was denied because the signifiers are skewed.

“A mask that is permanent pose”

Adad Hannah’s practice of still poses in a video, in which mimics a photograph. But also there is the notion that paintings are a leftovers of a process and there is a tradition of portraiture. In the article, I am wondering if Steinke is mourning this idea of a portrait.

She also inserts an interesting quote by Efrat Tseelon, “unsettle and disrupts. The fantasy of coherence replaces clarity with ambiguity and undermines the phantasmic construction of containment.” This kind of goes back to where what I was saying that siginfers are skewed; the idea of the face is not covered entirely, the elements that betray expression that isn’t complete.

Another thing that is interesting, and thought worth sharing, is that the article is reminiscence of Saul Steinberg’s Social masks. Steinberg describes certain parts of the face to be liars, among other things. He sets up the mask to be a performance of society too, a concept that is constructed and held up.

I see a lot of parallels with Steinke’s article with my own experience. The whole process has been strange. I like to think that I have become more sensitive to the body language. In the beginning, My partner would say how she needed to learn to “smile with your eyes”. It was as if we were all kids again, trying figure out how to talk. It shocked me to see how frustrated her she was through them, but also revealing of our shortcomings -as a population I mean.

To me, the face is the poster boy of the body, it’s logo in front of the brand. The more I think about it, the more I see it in others. It is because the face is the first thing that is addressed to when I engage with someone. Other body parts are treated differently. And what I find with my face covered is that information is expresses becomes ambiguous it becomes. Brand recognition is gone. At least, in the real world.

On social media it’s different. The notion of self is already masked through other means. In a later section of Skeinke’s article, they describe a veil and how it expands outward from the edges of the mask. In a way, this is an adequate description which can be given to our presence on the internet. To be on the internet is to chose make accounts whose forming is constitutional which reach out to other users.

Who am I without my mask? It is difficult to answer that because the mask I have been yapping about is not physical. To me, my mask is a portrait left behind by my attacks. It is socially constructed, I don’t know if there would be anything underneath. It is an aspect of my person that so dependent on society and people. Having a physical mask can change that, as long as the mask hasn’t be identified as being me.

That could be what is seemingly wrong with the masks we are told to wear during this time. At the start, it disrupted something about who you were. perhaps, it revealed more than it covered up. If my attacks are me then what does the performance of wearing mask signfy to someone else?

EXCERCISE:

Change your face three ways. Make up a new face, or a new way to hide your face. Make an alternative pandemic mask. Use your face as the base of a sculpture. Make your face into something that is not a face. Or that is someone else’s face.

Notes:

Some attempts:

A couple more:

Best Three:

2 thoughts on “Justin’s Work

  1. Justin:
    W1:
    Excellent notes on Sol Lewitt, Yoko Ono, Nauman complete and very good evidence of curiosity and engagement with material.
    Kilometre image and description – seems related to conceptual practice, I like how you showed all your thinking, and each component could be an expression of a KM. I like how you measured the kilometre precisely and how you documented it in multiple forms. Which do you find most interesting though?
    W2: Image of Abramovic/Stillness gesture, and description complete and a great simple idea! I appreciate you made yourself uncomfortable/challenged and even embarrassed – to create interest and meaning in the work– this is hilarious to be under the low coffee table! I’d love to see this as a video, with all the ambient sound of a normal household going on, and you doing this absurd gesture. Wish there was a bit more reference to Abramovic specifically– and a sense you were engaged with that material/ideas.
    W3: 6 conceptual sentences are complete and get the idea – to write the simple formula for actions in each piece, as opposed to broader themes. Defenestration image and description are good, wish it had more clarity (when it does the images are better) and more “air” or sky… but I think there should be more reason to throw the keyboard than just because it was around… maybe something frustrated, or about language even… could throwing a keyboard up in the air be a kind of performed poem? Ha! More possibilities to explore/express here, and there should always be a good reason for every choice.
    W4: Good notes on Adad’s work to get his formula, and I like your Distancing video,you’re your partner’s performance of stillness. I think it’s good she had a bag, and was really doing something in a real moment, caught in this portrait. Consider having more lighting in front of your subject next time, instead of in the background.
    Good effort on these pieces, do go through and think about all the lecture materials and references as thoroughly as you can, there are a lot of good ideas there and make sure everything is intentional. Good work, it’s fun having you in the class!

  2. If you would like to talk with me about your work in progress, readings, exercises, one-on-one comments on your work, and grades – send me an email in the morning to book a 15 minute appointment during my office hours: Thursdays 1:30-3
    And you can show up to a zoom meeting with Nathan anytime during these hours to ask your questions, and get tech support for using software and finishing your projects:
    Mondays and Thursdays 1-4pm

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.